The reaction I get from most non-Christians & socially conservative Christians when they find out Iâm both socially progressive & Christian is mostly the same:
(with maybe a little less crucifix-wielding from the non-Christians). They either think youâre not really Christian or not really progressive. Why is that? Both atheists and conservative Christians have pushed a particular theology as being objectively or uniquely Christian (McClellan 2015), while progressive Christians have been less clear in putting their theology out there (at least in my opinion). So, Iâm gonna try to work on that!
I grew up as a hardcore conservative evangelical. Eventually though, I started noticing too many disconnects between that and what I was reading in the Bible, or how I felt after praying. I became more and more socially progressive, though I didnât have a complete rooting of this in Scripture or in any particular theology. Some conflicts started piling up, like my support for LGBT folks and the âclobber passagesâ conservatives use to say homosexuality is a sin. My approach (for too long) was to just pray and follow my God-given conscience (see Romans 14:1-23; 1 John 3:21) but not necessarily to try to resolve these conflicts in terms of theology. Is there a coherent, faithful Christian theology that supports socially progressive views? Or are progressive Christians just deceiving themselves (1 Timothy 4:1-2) or picking and choosing which parts of Christianity to believe based on their own desires (2 Timothy 4:3)?
After a lot of study, prayer, and thought, Iâve come to a theological approach thatâs not only coherent, but faithfully seeks truth rather than simply seeking self-justification. This has strengthened my faith, brought me peace, and often deepened my commitment to progressive values that my conscience had intuitively been steering me toward.
So how does this work? Well if I could answer it all in one simple post I wouldnât need a blog! But, in this first post I want to give some broad strokes that apply generally, explain what most progressive theologians are after, and where I disagree or diverge with them.
The starting point is realizing that some popularizations of Christianity, often claiming to be âbiblical Christianityâ or something similar, are not truly just some objective interpretation of the biblical text, or some âpureâ form of Christianity. All theology and biblical interpretation occurs through a lens. Interpretations and theological stances Iâd been told were basically just plainly said in the Bible really werenât if you think it through deeply. Progressive Christian theology1 always starts with this âdeconstructionâ process, where you take apart what youâve been taught to believe about your religion to see whatâs really supported and what you do believe about your religion.
I have three main beefs with some other progressive Christian theology though: they often hide the ball, they donât always seem to be seeking truth, and they often seem to deny spiritual aspects of Christianity. I think there are some good critiques of progressive Christianity along these lines from conservative Christians (e.g. Bertuzzi 2020; Winger 2020), though I disagree with these critiquesâ ultimate conclusions.
Alissa Childers often recounts her foray into progressive Christianity in which her pastor eventually disclosed to her in a private group that he was actually agnostic (Bertuzzi 2020)! I have had a similar experience, which is what I mean about hiding the ball, and (in my view both wrongly and unnecessarily) discounting or denying spiritual aspects of Christianity.
Moreover, this deconstruction process for many progressive Christians starts with good intentions, but isnât completed in good faith, which is a pretty scathing but in my experience accurate critique from Alissa Childers (Bertuzzi 2020).2 It starts because we intuitively feel that something is morally wrong in where much of the Church has ended up, and so we (rightly) ask questions. However, it often seems like folks arenât seeking truth in that process. They either stop shy of seeking answers (like the agnostic pastor above), or they settle on answers that please them too quickly, uncritically accepting some claims that in my view arenât rock solid.
In short, progressive Christianity, I think, is great, but it can have some flaws in execution like anything else. It starts from a place of recognizing moral rot in the Church and seeking truth about the divine, though I disagree with some progressive Christian theologiansâ conclusions, and especially them sometimes not being upfront about their conclusions.
The approach that Iâve settled on, which seems coherent to me, which seems right to me, and allows me to faithfully seek truth, is this:
In short: Study, pray, and think (a lot!), but then always, always, check your theoglogical conclusions against two things: If it is of God, it should be life-giving, and it should be loving. It itâs not those things, youâve developed bad theology. Thatâs what progressive Christian theology is all about for me. Thatâs what it means to be a Christian for me, and thatâs ultimately why Iâm socially progressive.
Bertuzzi, Cameron. 2020. âAlisa Childers: âProgressive Christianity Is Dangerousâ.â May 20, 2020. https://youtu.be/oQ6doQsSQLU.
McClellan, Daniel O. 2015. âOn the Myth of Scriptural Literalism.â August 26, 2015. https://danielomcclellan.wordpress.com/2015/08/26/on-the-myth-of-scriptural-literalism/.
Winger, Mike. 2020. âProgressive Christians Are the Modern Sadducees: The Mark Series Pt 48 (12:18-27).â November 16, 2020. https://youtu.be/n9gMJdTqohI.
I want to be careful here because progressive Christian theology need not necessarily be theology supportive of socially progressive stances, though that is often the case. Iâm conflating them a little in this blog post, though I might do a deeper dive on this nuance some other week.â©ïž
I know I keep bringing up Alissa Childers, but as much as I disagree with her, progressive Christians would do well to address her not-baseless critiques!â©ïž